Call for Contributions: Doctoral Symposium
The SPLC Doctoral Symposium aims to provide a supportive environment that enables doctoral
students to get feedback on and improve their research. Students will have the opportunity to
discuss their work with experienced members of the community. Thus, the symposium offers a
unique opportunity to gather valuable expert feedback and to get into contact with other students
in the same field. The overall aim of the symposium is to improve the quality of doctoral theses
in the area of software product lines. The event is dedicated to Ph.D. candidates (2nd year or
later) with initial results that are not yet mature enough for a full conference paper. The SPLC
doctoral symposium covers the same research topics as the main conference.
Part I: Research Plan
To participate, students should prepare a research plan answering the following questions:
- What is the problem you intend to investigate?
- Why is the work important?
- How are you going to do the work?
- When (What has already been done and what remains to be done)?
In detail, the following structure and content is strongly recommended:
Front matter
Title, your name, email address, personal website, abstract
Introduction and Motivation
Introduction (area of study); description of the problem (that you tackle); what the literature
says about this problem (where does existing work fail?); how you (plan to) tackle this problem;
how you (plan to) implement your solution/envisioned result; how you (plan to) validate your
solution
Research Issues, Objectives, and Questions (and Hypotheses)
The main research issues / objectives / questions / hypotheses clearly stated.
Research Methodology and Research Design
- The research method(s) you are using or plan to use, with appropriate references.
- The research design: how you concretely plan to apply the method(s), e.g., data collection and
analysis, set-up for measurements/experiments, case studies, etc.
- How do you plan to evaluate your results? Threats to validity?
Preliminary key results or contributions
- Outline/Overview of the proposed solution, results of preliminary data analysis, etc.
- An example to explain how the solution would work (this is very important!)
- What is expected to be the main result or contribution?
Work plan
- Outline of the structure of your thesis
- Work accomplished so far and work remaining to be done
- Publication plan and other tasks planned
- A detailed work plan for the next 6-12 months.
Key references
The idea of the research plan is to provide clear material to be useful as a basis for guidance
and discussion. Therefore, students should think about the above points carefully and try to
make their ideas as concrete and clear as possible. Students at relatively early stages of their
research will certainly have difficulty addressing some of these, but should still attempt to do the
best they can. It is strongly recommended that students discuss these points with their supervisors!
Part II: Letter of Recommendation
Ask your supervisor/advisor for a letter of recommendation. It should include your name and a
candidate assessment of the current status of your thesis research and an expected date for
thesis submission.
Doctoral Symposium Chair
Goetz Botterweck, Lero and U Limerick, Ireland
Panel/Reviewers
Kyo C. Kang, POSTECH, South Korea
Tomi Mannisto, Aalto U, Finland
Tsuneo Nakanishi, Kyushu U, Japan
Natsuko Noda, NEC, Japan
Rick Rabiser, JKU Linz, Austria
Klaus Schmid, U Hildesheim, Germany
Submissions
Submissions should include a research plan (8
pages max. in ACM SIGS proceedings format,
http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates,
tighter style) and a letter of recommendation.
All submissions must be in English,
in PDF format, and must not contain or cite
proprietary or confidential material. The research
plan should be submitted via EasyChair at
https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=splc2013
(select Doctoral Symposium as submission type).
The letter of recommendation should
be sent by email to
goetz.botterweck(at)lero.ie
Important Dates
Submission deadline June 15, 2013
Notification of acceptance June 25, 2013
Camera-ready version July 6, 2013
Doctoral Symposium August, 2013
Review and Evaluation Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated by at least two
reviewers according to relevance, originality and
feasibility of the described research. Also see
the bullet points sketching out suggested content
for the research plan.
Format
The symposium will be held in conjunction with
SPLC 2013. Each participant gets the chance to
present his/her work (full presentation or short
presentation) and will get feedback from the
panellists and the audience. In particular, the
presenters will be provided with an opportunity
for direct discussions with the reviewers.
Students are recommended to prepare particular
points they want to get feedback on and/or want
to discuss.
Publication
The research plan papers will be published as
part of the SPLC proceedings (vol. 2) with workshop papers and tool demo papers.
All submitters are required to meet the tight
deadline for camera-ready submissions and to
present their work at the conference.
We recommend to discuss the submission, the letter of
recommendation, and the travel with your supervisor early on.
PDF version (download) [160 KB]
|